Hybrid Mobile App Development is the Key to Greater ROI

Hybrid mobile app development has been around for more than a decade, with the first hybrid frameworks appearing in the late 2000s. The concept of hybrid apps was developed to provide a way to build mobile apps that can work on multiple platforms using a single codebase instead of developing separate apps for each platform.

One of the earliest hybrid frameworks was PhoneGap, which was released in 2009. PhoneGap allowed developers to use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build mobile apps that could be deployed on multiple platforms.

Another popular hybrid framework that emerged around the same time was Titanium, which used JavaScript to create cross-platform mobile apps.

Over the years, hybrid app development has evolved significantly, with new frameworks and tools emerging to simplify the development process. In recent years, frameworks like Flutter and React Native have gained popularity due to their ease of use, performance, and ability to create native-like apps.

Several popular apps have been built using hybrid app development frameworks, including:

What makes the hybrid development approach popular is its ability to ensure a higher ROI as compared to native app development.

Every IT endeavor goes through the test of return on investment. Given the high cost of development for mobile app development projects, IT leaders and companies need to find the right balance between app functionalities and development costs.

Hybrid apps are a winner in this category as they deliver native-like functionalities (in some cases even better than native apps) while keeping the cost low. Here are some parameters that make hybrid apps ROI winners.

Reducing the scope of a project from two codebases to one can have a significant impact on app development and maintenance time. In fact, it is logical to expect a time savings of at least 50% by leveraging a single codebase for hybrid app development.

This allows developers to save time and effort that would otherwise be spent on hiring separate developers, researching different libraries and APIs, and maintaining and updating multiple versions of the same app.

Additionally, hybrid app development reduces the need to design and run multiple test cases, further saving time and resources.

Overall, hybrid app development presents a cost-effective and streamlined approach to app development that can help businesses save time and resources while delivering high-quality mobile apps.

The 2019 Stack Overflow Survey revealed that less than 7% of developers have the necessary skills to develop apps using the native toolkits and languages for Apple and Google platforms. Due to the scarcity of native mobile developers, it can be assumed that salaries for these professionals are higher than average. If you don’t have a native developer in-house, you should expect to allocate an additional 20% of year 1 costs towards hiring and onboarding.

Furthermore, since many native developers specialize in just one platform, you’ll likely need more than one developer to complete a project for both iOS and Android. This means you should double your minimum team size estimation.

In contrast, the same survey showed that 70% of professional developers are proficient in the basics of web development, such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. This indicates that you may already have a team of web developers in-house, or it may be easier to find web developers to staff your project than the relatively scarce pool of native mobile developers.

The cost advantage of developing with the hybrid instead of native could determine whether a project is approved or not.

Let’s assume a native mobile project with the following inputs:

In this example, the native project would generate a profit of $24,640 per year over a three-year period, resulting in a return on investment of approximately 16%.

However, if we were to increase the active maintenance time to 12 weeks per year, the cost of native development would rise to $195,840 over the three-year period. This would result in a negative return on investment of -30%, making the project infeasible from a financial standpoint.

In contrast, building the app using hybrid development could potentially reduce development and maintenance costs, making the project more feasible even with increased maintenance time.

The hybrid approach offers a significant reduction in initial time-to-market by 50%, allowing us to launch our product in just 12 weeks instead of the previous 24 weeks.

Furthermore, we can expect ongoing maintenance costs to be reduced by 50% as well, resulting in only 7.5 weeks per year, freeing up valuable resources that can be utilized elsewhere.

Businesses keep building hybrid mobile apps as it enables them to operate across platforms with a single investment. Here are some key benefits of hybrid mobile apps:

Hybrid apps have the potential to scale better than native apps due to several reasons.

Firstly, hybrid apps leverage web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, which are known to be highly scalable. These technologies have been around for decades and have evolved over time to handle the most complex web applications. Developers can easily reuse code across different platforms, making it easier to maintain and update the app as it scales.

Secondly, hybrid apps can utilize cloud-based solutions, providing scalable resources, such as storage and computing power. This enables the app to handle increasing users and data without compromising performance.

Finally, hybrid apps can take advantage of the latest advancements in technology, such as machine learning and artificial intelligence, to provide personalized user experiences. These features require significant computational resources and data processing power, which can be easily achieved through cloud-based solutions and other scalable resources.

Hybrid apps use web technologies, which are often more familiar to developers. For example, HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are widely used, and there are many resources available for troubleshooting and solving issues.

In addition, web technologies allow for easier and more frequent updates. Changes can be made to the codebase and then deployed across all platforms simultaneously, making it easier to maintain consistency and fix issues quickly.

Another advantage of hybrid apps is the ability to use web development tools and frameworks like Flutter, which can streamline development and make it easier to fix issues. These tools often have built-in features for debugging and testing, allowing developers to identify and resolve problems more efficiently.

Furthermore, hybrid apps are often designed with modularity in mind, which means that individual components can be easily swapped out or updated without disrupting the entire application. This can make maintenance and updates easier and less risky.

Limiting your app to only one platform can significantly reduce your potential user base, as it excludes users on other operating systems. In today’s highly competitive market, targeting a single audience segment can severely limit your growth opportunities.

According to Statista, Android holds a dominant 71.8% share of the global market, while iOS follows closely behind with 27.6%, collectively accounting for around 99%. By opting for hybrid app development, you can expand your reach to a wider audience on both platforms and potentially grow your user base globally.

Hybrid apps can leverage caching techniques to store frequently accessed data on the device. This can reduce the amount of data that needs to be fetched from the server, resulting in smoother and faster performance, particularly in areas with slow or unreliable internet connections.

Additionally, hybrid apps can also use technologies like Service Workers, which allow them to function offline by storing a version of the app locally on the user’s device. This can provide users with access to some app features and data, even when they are not connected to the internet.

Offline access is important for users for several reasons:

As per Statista, Flutter and React Native are the top cross-platform mobile frameworks and will continue to be. Given the popularity, there will be an abundance of resources for these platforms, and therefore, most hybrid mobile app development projects will utilize the same.

Flutter, developed by Google, has gained significant traction in recent years due to its performance and ease of use. Flutter uses Dart programming language and has a customizable UI toolkit that allows developers to create visually appealing, fast, and responsive mobile apps.

Flutter also offers a hot reload feature that enables developers to make changes to the code and see the changes instantly on the app, making it faster and easier to build and test apps.

Additionally, Flutter has a growing community of developers, which has led to the development of several plugins and libraries that can be used to extend its functionality.

React Native, on the other hand, was developed by Facebook and has gained similar popularity as a hybrid app development framework. React Native uses JavaScript, which is widely used and familiar to many developers. It offers a rich set of pre-built components and libraries that can be used to develop mobile apps quickly and efficiently.

React Native has a large and active community of developers who contribute to its ecosystem, creating a wide range of tools and resources.